|
|
Nuclear power plants and
iodine tablets
For risks and side effects ask your physician
or read...
Attention:
The translations on this
page had not been completed and verified. Please refer to
the German
original. |
Package insert for nuclear power ...
|
Author:
Wolfgang Rehfus
Date:
12.11.2004 German
original |
●
Radioactivity in a nuclear power plant
●
No protection by iodine tablets
●
Risks and side effects of nuclear power plants
●
Safe protection by renewable energies
●
Medical memorandum for the industrial use of nuclear
energy (summary)
●
Appendix: Open letter at government (Bundesrat) and
parliament
(energy
regulation EnV: Package insert for nuclear power)
●
PS ... |
|
Radioactivity |
|
|
|
 |
»The quantity of radioactivity,
which is present in a reactor, is larger than the quantity of radioactivity
spread by a nuclear bomb - significantly larger.«
(Prof. Dr. C. F. von Weizsäcker, nuclear physicist) 1)
»A reactor in one day produces as much radioactivity as a 50-kt
nuclear explosion.«
(Prof. Dr. Richard L. Garwin, nuclear physicist) 2)
This amount
of radioactivity is equivalent with 1460 nuclear bombs the size of
Hiroshima (12.5 kt) for each nuclear reactor in each year! 3) |
1) see
"Ärztliches Memorandum zur industriellen Nutzung der Atomenergie",
Dr. med. Max Otto Bruker u.a.
2) see
Prof. Dr.
Richard L. Garwin (nuclear physicist), «Can the World Do Without Nuclear
Power? Can the World Live With Nuclear Power?»,
Nuclear Control Institute, 9.4.2001 (see
copy page 5
)
3) see
Hiroshima Atombombe à 12.5 kt (Copy
),
International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War (IPPNW,
1985 Nobel Peace Prize)
see also
Glaubhafte
Friedenspolitik erfordert Verzicht auf Atomenergie!, Offener Brief an Bundespräsident
Köhler in Deutschland, SolarPeace.org, 24.5.2005 |
|
Iodine tablets |
|
|
|
Iodine tablets do not protect against a
country-wide radioactive contamination.
 |
No protection by iodine tablets
In Switzerland iodine tablets (potassium
iodide tablets) are distributed to the population in the periphery of 20
kilometers around the 5 Swiss nuclear power plants. These iodine tablets are
to protect the population in the case of a radioactive accident in a nuclear
power plant against thyroid cancer, not however against other
radiation damages. 4)
But the radioactivity from
nuclear power plants does not stop at these 20-kilometer-borders. What is
with the remaining population? Also the iodine tablets offer expressly no
protection against radioactive radiation, which affects the body from
outside.
Therefore Iodine tablets certainly
cannot protect against a country-wide radioactive contamination!
The Swissmedic writes under
'correct behavior in an emergency' that the remaining population is
usually not concerned, and as 'background information': "Potassium
iodide tablets prevent that radioactive iodine, which is taken up over the
respiratory system,
enriches itself in the thyroid. The
potassium iodide tablets offer however no general protection against
radiation, which affects the body from outside. Therefore in the
event of an endangerment by radioactivity the house
inside and/or a cellar or a shelter must be
visited. The protection of the thyroid with
potassium iodides is considered as a safe and
harmless measure."
5)
"No general protection against radiation" is thus
according to Swissmedic
a safe measure. And in
the shelter prescribed
in addition to the
iodine tablets there (hopefully) is anyway no radioactive iodine, which
could be taken up over the respiratory system, otherwise it
would be no shelter?
The potassium iodide
tablets are thus more than a rough mischief and a playing down of the actual
dangers by nuclear power plants!
On the risks and side
effects of iodine for the human organism mostly one does not report.
Artificially supplied iodine in the nutrition increases the
Nitrosaminbildung for example by at least
the 6-fold, and increases thereby in principle the risk for cancer. Iodine
is enriched not only in the thyroid, but
also in other organs, e.g. in salivary glands, stomach,
Laktierenden chest glands, Placenta, plexus
chorioideus, skin. 6) |
4) vgl.
Pressemitteilung, Swissmedic, 29.10.2004
vgl. das Kapitel 'Jod, Strontium, Krypton und Plutonium' in:
Ärztliches Memorandum zur industriellen Nutzung der Atomenergie,
Dr. med. Max Otto Bruker u.a.
5) vgl. www.kaliumiodid.ch, ATAG Wirtschaftsorganisationen AG (im
Auftrag der Swissmedic, Schweizerisches Heilmittelinstitut)
vgl. auch
"AKW-Lobby befürchtet Imageschaden", "Die Direktion des Atomkraftwerkes
Gösgen lässt verlauten, sogar eine Vorverteilung im kleinen Kreise sei
wissenschaftlich unnötig und imageschädigend! Sie bittet darum, mit dem
Neuverteilen der Tabletten sei zuzuwarten bis nach den energiepolitischen
Abstimmungen. Der Bundesrat hat dieser Bitte entsprochen.",
zitiert aus: "Kaliumiodid: (k)ein Thema vor der Strom ohne Atom-Abstimmung?", Greenpeace, 9.2.2003;
vgl. hierzu
Die
Natur gewinnt immer!, SolarPeace.org, 18.8.2003
6) vgl.
www.jod-kritik.de und die dort angegebenen Links, z.B.:
Krebskrank durch Jod?, Dagmar Braunschweig-Pauli, BALANCE® 4/2000 und
Der Jod-Krimi, Dr. med. M.O. Bruker und Ilse Gutjahr, BALANCE® 1/2000
vgl. "Ab einem Alter von 45 ist nach Angaben der Experten die Gefahr einer
Schilddrüsenüberfunktion größer als das Risiko von Schilddrüsenkrebs, so
dass dieser Personenkreis keine Jodtabletten benötige.",
Jodsättigung der Schilddrüsen für den Super-GAU
aus: 'Krankmacher Jod - Die Chronik eines Jahrhundertskandals', Dagmar Braunschweig-Pauli,
2002, ISBN 3-927124-40-0
vgl. Krank durch Jod auch
in der Schweiz!, Selbsthilfegruppe
Jod Krank Schweiz |
|
Nuclear
power |
|
|
|
Nuclear energy is for reasons of economy, security,
neutrality, ecology and health no option of the future power supply.
Further information:
"Atomenergie - Kalkulierte Menschenopfer" in
Grün gewinnt - Die letzte Ölkrise und danach, Dr. Rudolf Rechsteiner |
Risks and side effects of nuclear
power plants
Perhaps it is good on the occasion of these
ordered iodine tablets, if we recall into our minds the complete problem of
nuclear power plants:
-
Billions
at subsidies and state privileges are the causes that nuclear energy is
sold very favourably, in reality however it is by far the most expensive
form of energy and damages our national economy. 7)
Nuclear power costs 3 CHF/kWh or 2
Euro/kWh (without subsidies and state privileges). Today solar
electricity costs approx. 1 CHF/kWh (without subsidies) and is thereby 66 %
more favourably than nuclear power. 8)
-
A
GAU
(largest accident which can be foreseen) leads to a country-wide
radioactive contamination. Artificially calculated probabilities are
perfectly irrelevant with such risks! The Federal Office for civil defense
and the Federal Office for energy (BfE) calculate for a core melt-through
accident damage costs from 4'200 to 4'300 billion CHF. 9)
-
The
appraisal of the German society for reactor safety (GRS) to the terror
dangers for nuclear power plants
resulted in that "the purposeful crash of an airplane can lead for each
German nuclear power plant to a
Super-GAU."
This applies to all
nuclear
power plants and surely not only to "purposeful" airplane crashes.
10)
-
Nuclear
power plants make neutrality impossible, as uranium, the raw material
for nuclear energy, is 100% imported and it becomes increasingly difficult
to distinguish between "peaceful" and military usages of nuclear energy. The
countries, which strive for nuclear weapons, try this over the bridge of
nuclear energy. With the further spreading of nuclear energy the danger of
spreading nuclear weapons and the propagation of nuclear terrorism grows. 11)
-
Today the
nuclear energy has a portion of the primary energy consumption of the world
from far under ten per cent. If we would aim at a world-wide portion of
forty per cent of primary energy from nuclear power stations, the uranium
supplies would be exhausted within 10 years. Contrary to the
fossil energy raw materials a gap between mining quantities and consumption
already exists with uranium for several years. With recent numbers
from the International Energy Agency in Paris (IEA) with
40% primary energy from nuclear power plants the uranium supplies became
even just enough for only 5 years. 12)
-
The
radioactive nuclear waste
radiates for many 1'000 years, cannot not be eliminated, is
high-grade carcinogenic and poisonous. Nuclear
waste is an unsolvable problem and last but not least also an economical and
an irresponsible mortgage to coming generations. Since only 0.1 % of the
fuel material in the reactor is converted into energy, thus 99.9 % remain as
radioactive nuclear waste, nuclear reactors
produce inconceivable quantities of nuclear waste
each day. 13)
"Radioactive waste is the most dangerous waste product of
the industrial society, and the most long-living inheritance of our
civilization. In each phase of the nuclear cycle radioactive waste is
produced - with the exploitation of uranium, with the enterprise of nuclear
power plants and during the reprocessing. The Swiss nuclear power plant in
Leibstadt alone produces 300'000 tons radiating ore each year. During the
reprocessing the high-dangerous plutonium is separated and further
nuclear waste is created." 14)
-
The
medical effects of the nuclear power plants are nearly unknown in the
public. That shows also an example in Germany, in which scientists of the
federal state government accuse "masking".
The majority of the professional commission in Schleswig Holstein to find
the cause of the leukaemia illnesses explained its resignation. Children
continue to get sick remarkably frequently with leukaemia around the
nuclear power plants in Geesthacht. 15)
Dr. med. Max-Otto Bruker together with the nuclear
physicists Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Karl Bechert and Prof. Dr. C. F. von
Weizsäcker had provided the "Medical memorandum for the industrial use of
nuclear energy". The summary version published below is completely quoted
from it. 18)
Also the report ECRR 2003 of the 'European Committee on Radiation Risk'
states firmly that "It is not possible accurately to determine ‘radiation dose to
populations’." and comes to the conclusion: "Nuclear
power is a costly way of producing energy when human health deficits are
included in the overall assessment." 16)
|
7)
"BfE:
Atomenergie schadet der Schweizer Volkswirtschaft", SolarPeace.org,
29.4.2003
vgl.
115 Mrd. Subventionen und Staatsprivilegien
,
Solar Agentur Schweiz, 2003
8)
"Die AKW Begeisterung steckt tief im Kühlturm"
, 3.3.2000,
CASH; und die dort
zitierte Studie "Privatisierung der
KKW-Haftung in der BRD", Gutachten der Regierung Kohl (CDU/CSU/FDP), Sept.
1992
vgl.
CDAK-Grundsatzpapier, CHRISTLICHE DEMOKRATEN GEGEN ATOMKRAFT (CDAK),
BUNDESVERBAND CDU/CSU - Mitglieder für die Überwindung der Kernenergie,
17.05.2005
vgl.
"Atomstrom würde 5 CHF/kWh kosten ...", Greenpeace, 24.5.2005
9) vgl.
Inefffizienz, Marktverzerrung und 4'300 Milliarden Franken Risikokosten
durch Atomenergie.
in der Studie "Verbesserte Deckung des Nuklearrisikos
- zu welchen Bedingungen?",
Bundesamt für Energie (Dezember 2000)
vgl.
Ein neues Atomkraftwerk für die Schweiz?, "... Bei zwei Euroreaktoren à
1600 MW ist das im Jahr die Radioaktivität von 3200 Hiroshima Bomben.",
Bund für Umwelt und Naturschutz (BUND) e.V., 21.2.2007
see »A reactor in one day produces as much radioactivity as a 50-kt
nuclear explosion.«,
Prof. Dr.
Richard L. Garwin (Atomphysiker), «Can the World Do Without Nuclear
Power? Can the World Live With Nuclear Power?», Nuclear Control Institute, 9.4.2001 (see
copy page 5
)
Note: this corresponds to annually 1460
Hiroshima Atombomben
à 12.5 kt (Copy
),
International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War (IPPNW,
1985 Nobel Peace Prize)
vgl.
"Super-GAU-Risiko in Europa: 16 Prozent", Internationale Ärzte
für die Verhütung des Atomkrieges
Ärzte in sozialer Verantwortung e.V. (IPPNW), 2005, vgl.
Poster im
"Nuclear
Power Fact File""Nuclear
Power Fact File"
vgl. „Das zentrale Sicherheitssystem hat nicht funktioniert“,
Schwere Panne in bulgarischem Kernkraftwerk und "Das Risiko für
Reaktorkatastrophen ist weit höher, als die Betreiber behaupten",
In letzter Minute, Der Tagesspiegel, 23.04.2006; vgl. auch:
Kein Tschernobyl in Bulgarien!
10) vgl. Kapitel
"Sicherheit" der Studie "Chancen für unsere Zukunft", SolarPeace.org, 14.11.2003
vgl.
Sicherheit von Atomkraftwerken bei Erdbeben, Schweizerischer
Nationalrat, 02.10.2006
11) vgl. Kapitel
"Neutralität" der Studie "Chancen für unsere Zukunft", SolarPeace.org, 14.11.2003
vgl.
"Erneuerbare Energien statt Atomenergie"
,
Gemeinnützige Europäische Vereinigung für erneuerbare Energien e.V.
EuroSolar, 2004
12)
Ludwig-Bölkow-Systemtechnik GmbH, Rubrik 'Uran: Kernenergie und Kernfusion'.
vgl. "Die
Prognosen des Weltenergierats sind eindeutig: Das Uran reicht 60 Jahre", Dr. Franz Alt,
2001
vgl.
"Nur 3,3% der weltweit verbrauchten Energie stammen aus den 440
Atomkraftwerken", Internationale Energieagentur in Paris,
IEA, 01.07.2005; vgl. auch
Die Träume der Atomlobby, Dr. Franz Alt, 2004
vgl. auch
"Versorgungslücke und Prognosen (Erdöl, Erdgas, Uran)" in der
Studie "Chancen für unsere Zukunft", SolarPeace.org, 14.11.2003
13) vgl. die Kapitel 'Die Halbwertszeit' und 'Der
Atommüll' in:
Ärztliches Memorandum zur industriellen Nutzung der Atomenergie,
Dr. med. Max Otto Bruker u.a.
vgl.
"Yucca Mountain, USA", CBS NEWS, 25.7.2004
vgl.
Problem Atommüll weltweit ungelöst, Internationales Endlager Symposium,
Greenpeace 10.11.2002
14) vgl.
Hunderttausend Jahre lang, Greenpeace, 27.11.2000
15) vgl.
Leukämie bei AKW: Wissenschaftler werfen Landesregierung „Verschleierung“
vor., Prof. Dr. Otmar Wassermann u.a., 15.9.2004;
"Abschlussbericht der Fachkomission zur Leukämie-Häufung bei Kindern" im
Artikel "Sind Waffentests Ursache für Leukämie bei Kindern in der
Elbmarsch?", Zeit-Fragen Nr.43, 8.11.2004
vgl.
Gutachten: Folgen Tschernobyls unterschätzt, Süddeutsche Zeitung, 6.4.2006;
vgl. auch
Tschernobyl, der Krebs und die widersprüchlichen Todeszahlen, 8.4.2006
vgl.
"US-Regierung fürchtet Schadenersatzforderungen (Radiojod und
Schilddrüsenkrebs)" im Artikel: "Klärung von Gesundheitsfolgen des Tschernobyl-Unfalls stösst auf Widerstand", Zeit-Fragen Nr.8, 1.3.2004
vgl.
".. stieg die Krebsrate um 20 Prozent", Journal of Epidemology and
Community Health, 26.11.2004
vgl.
"Wie hoch ist Krebsbelastung durch Atomkraftwerke (AKW) im Normalbetrieb?",
Kinderkrebsregister der Universität Mainz u.a., 19.01.2003
vgl.
Atomenergie und Gesundheit, Internationale Ärzte
für die Verhütung des Atomkrieges
Ärzte in sozialer Verantwortung e.V. (IPPNW), vgl. auch
"Gesundheitliche Folgen von Tschernobyl - 20 Jahre nach der
Reaktorkatastrophe", Studie von IPPNW und Gesellschaft für
Strahlenschutz
vgl. auch
"Die Verharmlosung der atomaren Niedrigstrahlung"
(Dr. Rosalie Bertell, USA)
vgl.
Atomreaktoren schädigen Volksgesundheit, Bericht zur Studie von Prof.
Dr. Sternglass, Universität Pittsburgh USA, 20.7.2006
vgl.
Strahlung und die Wirkung auf Menschen, ICRP (International Commission
on Radiological Protection) und Bundesumweltministerium, 20.6.2007
16)
ECRR 2003 - Recommendations of the European Committee on Radiation Risk,
Brussels 2003; vgl. die Kernaussagen aus diesem Bericht weiter unten bei Quellenangabe 16. |
|
Protection |
|
|
|
Opportunities for our Future
The significance of national renewable
energies
www.SolarPeace.org
|
Safe protection by
renewable energies
All these risks and side
effects of nuclear power plants (apart from the radioactive waste already
existing) can be easily avoided, if the use of nuclear energy is terminated
as fast as possible.
There are sufficient alternative potentials by
safe renewable energies (sun, water, wind, biomass/gas, geothermal)
including the necessary technologies and financial means. 17)
The significance of
national renewable energies in the full context of
peace, economics, security, neutrality and ecology is published with
complete source data on
www.SolarPeace.org. |
17) vgl. "Ersatz-Potential
für 15 Atomkraftwerke"
, 'Energie&Umwelt', 1/03
und
Potenziale der rationellen Elektrizitätsverwendung und der
Elektrizitätserzeugung aus erneuerbaren Energien
,
Bundesamt für Energie (BfE),
30.1.2003
vgl.
Vorhandene
Technologien, mögliche Finanzmittel, zielgerichtete Massnahmen im
Beitrag "sun21: Bundesrätin Calmy-Rey spricht zu
Frieden durch saubere Energie - statt Krieg um Öl", SolarPeace.org,
5.5.2004
vgl.
"Ein Drittel des Atomausstiegs ist bereits geschafft",
29.4.2005
und
Obrigheim - Magazin zum Abschalten
sowie
"Atomkraft: Auslaufmodell der Energieverschwendung",
Bundesumweltministerium Deutschland anlässlich Tschernobyl-Jahrestag am
26.04.2005
|
|
Health |
|
|
|
The
medical and ecological view does not permit any other judgement, than to
describe the operation of nuclear power plants as irresponsibly.
Further information:
"Die
Folgen von Tschernobyl - Ein Überblick", Internationale Ärzte für die
Verhütung des Atomkrieges Ärzte in sozialer Verantwortung e.V. (IPPNW)
"Gesundheitliche
Folgen von Tschernobyl - 20 Jahre nach der Reaktorkatastrophe", Studie
von IPPNW und Gesellschaft für Strahlenschutz, 06.04.2006
"Verschlußsache Tschernobyl - Die geheimen Dokumente aus dem Kreml - Unsere
Kinder sterben. Helft uns!", Alla Jaroshinskaja, 376 Seiten, 16 Fotos
und 40 Dokumente, ISBN 3-86163-062-1, 21.4.2006
"Atomenergie - Kalkulierte Menschenopfer" in
Grün gewinnt - Die letzte Ölkrise und danach, Dr. Rudolf Rechsteiner |
Medical memorandum for the industrial use of nuclear energy
Completely quoted summary version 18)
»For the
evaluation of the health and life threat by the operation of nuclear power
plants only physicians, biologists and ecologists are competent and nobody
else. Since the nuclear bomb everyone knows that nuclear fission is
afflicted with high risks for the health. Already during the normal
operation an emission of firm and gaseous radionuclides into the environment
can not be prevented despite adherence to strictest safety precautions
(therefore tolerances).
In alive organisms
the effect of ionizing rays begins with the primary procedure of the
energieabsorption within the atomic and molecular range. Secondary reactions
follow, which are in the beginning of simple chemical nature, soon however
reach into the range of complicated metabolic reactions. Primary event and
following radiochemical secondary sequences lead to two types of radiation
damage: The change of cell structures and changes of the cellular
metabolism.
"What do you prefer: To save
energy and use solar power, resulting in fewer cancer patients as well as
genetic disorders, or to use nuclear power?"
(Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Karl Bechert,
nuclear physicist)
The radiation dose
form nuclear power plants is compared by the proponents of nuclear power
plants again and again with the natural base radiation, in order to pay down
the dangers. This comparison is from the scientific point of view untenable
and misleading, because with the cosmic radiation it predominantly
concerns radiation, with which no radioactive substances are incorporated.
With the natural base radiation also radioactive substances, e.g. C 14, are
involved; the substantial difference in relation to the emissions from
nuclear reactors consists however of the fact that it concerns
with the latter radioactive substances, which are completely new.
Their general effect, which exists in the production of somatic and genetic
damages, is well-known, however the specific effects of the numerous
isotopes will not be sufficiently investigated for a long time. Particularly
for the long-term and late effects still no experiences can be present,
since the contamination with the substances from the artificial nuclear
fission takes place only since relatively short time.
During the
irradiation of a human with the maximally permitted dose it would to be
expected that one human out of ten would get a cancer of the lungs. There
are up to now no safe data, from which a smallest dose of plutonium 239
arises, below which no generation of cancer is possible.
"There is no proof for the fact
that there is a safe
tolerance limit for the radiation."
(Radiation laboratory in Livermore /
California)
The damaging effect
of even smallest doses is summed up during long periods.
In the medicine one
uses irradiation in individual cases purposefully. Nuclear industry causes
completely unaimed effects, before which no organism on earth is safe. Only
0.1 % of the fuel material in the reactor is converted into energy, 99.9 %
remain as high-radioactive nuclear waste. There is no possibility of
destroying radioactivity.
"We do not want to perish in a
nuclear disaster, we do not want that our descendants curse us, because we
did not offer resistance to the nuclear insanity!"
(Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Karl Bechert,
nuclear physicist)
In summary it must
be stated that above all increasing hereditary defects is to be expected as
consequence of the radioactive contamination. The medical and ecological
view does not permit any other judgement, than to describe the operation of
nuclear power plants considering today's conditions of science and
technology as irresponsibly. The largest accident (GAU), which can be
accepted, which will allegedly never occur, became reality in the nuclear
reactor of Tschernobyl. The disaster proved the dangers.«
Dr. med.
M. 0. Bruker
|
18) vgl.
Ärztliches Memorandum zur industriellen Nutzung der Atomenergie,
Dr. med. Max Otto Bruker, emu-Verlag, 5. Auflage (ISBN 3-89189-015-X,
Copyright emu Verlags- und Vertriebs-GmbH).
vgl. auch
"Die Verharmlosung der atomaren Niedrigstrahlung" (Dr. Rosalie Bertell,
USA)
see also
Radiation and Health
, Dr. Bill Williams,
energyscience.org.au, Nov 2006
vgl. auch
"Was tun bei Gift-Alarm? - Im Notfall fliehen?", Konradin Kreuzer (dipl.
Ing. Chem. ETH)
vgl. auch
ECRR 2003 - Recommendations of the European Committee on Radiation Risk,
'The Health Effects of Ionising Radiation Exposure at Low Doses and Low
Dose Rates for Radiation Protection Purposes',
Brussels 2003, ISBN 1-897761-24-4;
Hier einige Kernaussagen:
● "...
UN Declaration of Human Rights should be applied to the
question of avoidable radiation exposures ...."
●
"... the smallest <radioactive> dose has a finite,
if small, probability of fatal harm."
● "It is not possible accurately to determine ‘radiation
dose to
populations’... "
●
"... each exposure should be addressed in terms of its
effects at the cell or molecular level."
● "... recommends
caution in attempting to gauge the effects of novel exposures by comparison
with exposures to natural radiation."
●
"Comparisons between external and internal radiation
exposures may also result in underestimates of risk since the effects at the
cell level may be quantitatively very different."
●
"... physical models of
radiation action cannot take precedence over epidemiological studies of
exposed populations."
●
"... very little is known
about the mechanisms leading from cell impact to clinical disease."
●
"... health effects
relative to the radiation dose are proportionately higher at low doses
..."
●
"... unequivocal
evidence of harm from internal irradiation at low dose."
●
"... the present cancer
epidemic is a consequence ... and that more recent releases of
radioisotopes to the environment from the operation of the nuclear fuel
cycle will result in significant increases in cancer and other types of
ill health."
●
"... the total number of
deaths resulting from the nuclear project since 1945. ... 61,600,000
deaths from cancer, 1,600,000 infant deaths and 1,900,000 foetal deaths.
... 10% loss of life quality integrated over all diseases..."
●
"... nuclear power is a costly way of producing
energy when human health deficits are included in the overall assessment." |
|
Appendix |
|
|
|
The government (Bundesrat) is committed to
the long-term well-being of the entire population and the entire national
economy.
20) |
Appendix: Open letter at government
(Bundesrat) and parliament 19)
(package
insert for nuclear power - revised energy regulation EnV)
Kilchberg, 26. November 2004
Nuclear power plants and iodine
tablets
For risks and side effects ask your
physician or read...
Very honoured Bundeskanzlerin,
Very honoured Bundesrätin,
Very honoured Upper and Lower House of Parliament
Each also still so harmless
medicine has a package insert to risk and side effects, and each
advertisement must refer to it. Each patient can individually decide,
whether he takes the medicine and if side effects occur, then only this
patient is concerned.
With nuclear power plants and nuclear power there is no
package insert to risks and side effects and the population is still not
completely informed about risks and side effects. The risks and side effects
concern the entire population every day, including the owner of a solar
house, who does not consume nuclear power. Since the risks and side effects
of nuclear power plants contain the radioactive contamination of the entire
country, artificially calculated probabilities are perfectly irrelevant!
Therefore no insurance is ready to take this risk. But the population is
forced to carry this risk each day.
"Nuclear industry
causes completely unaimed effects, before which no organism on earth is safe"
(Dr. med. Max Otto Bruker)
Together
with this letter you receive the package insert for risks and side effects
of nuclear power plants and nuclear power. I would like to suggest that
this package insert is attached to all supplies of nuclear power in the
future and that each advertisement for nuclear power refers to it. Thus
the primary goal of the power marking in the revised energy regulation (EnV)
becomes - "the protection and the transparent information of consumers" -
consistently is put in place.
21)
This
open letter at government (Bundesrat) and parliament of Switzerland is
published on www.SolarPeace.org as
appendix to the current contribution "Nuclear power plants and iodine
tablets" together with further information, the complete
"Medical memorandum for the industrial use of
nuclear energy" and all source data. For your valued answer I
thank you very cordially in advance.
I wish
you a Merry Christmas time and the strength in the coming year to take the
necessary energy-political decisions.
22)
Yours
sincerely
Wolfgang Rehfus
www.SolarPeace.org
|
19)
Der Originalbrief an Bundesrat und Parlament der Schweiz ...
, SolarPeace.org,
26.11.2004 und die Beilagen:
●
Package insert for nuclear power ...
●
SolarPeace Flyer
20) vgl.
Offener Brief an den Schweizerischen Bundesrat zur Verkehrs- und
Energiepolitik!, SolarPeace.org,
28.1.2004
vgl.
"sun21: Pegasus erhebt sich aus dem Wasserschloss", Offener
Brief an Bundesrat und Parlament der Schweiz, SolarPeace.org, 28.6.2004
vgl.
"Hat
"Fahrenheit 9/11" Konsequenzen für die Schweiz?", Offener Brief an
Bundesrat und Parlament der Schweiz, SolarPeace.org, 30.8.2004
21) Revidierte Energieverordnung (EnV): "Die primären
Ziele der Stromkennzeichnung sind der Schutz und die transparente
Information der Konsumentinnen und Konsumenten.",
"Herkunft des Stroms wird künftig deklariert", UVEK Eidgenössisches
Departement für Umwelt, Verkehr, Energie, Kommunikation, Bundesamt für
Energie, 10.11.2004
22)
vgl.
Vorhandene
Technologien, mögliche Finanzmittel, zielgerichtete Massnahmen im
Beitrag "sun21: Bundesrätin Calmy-Rey spricht zu
Frieden durch saubere Energie - statt Krieg um Öl", SolarPeace.org,
5.5.2004 |
|
PS ... |
|
|
|
Please
tell others ... |
P.S.
Please pass these information via E-Mail, SMS,
copied, by telephone or verbally over to business
partners, customers,
guests, members, colleagues, friends, etc..
Cordial thanks |
Print version:
Package insert for nuclear power ...
, for
passing on ...
see also
Atomkraftwerke und Jod-Tabletten on www.Sonnenseite.com,
30.11.2004 |
|
